Monday, February 15, 2016

What Kills Me…: Globalizing to Make Your Organization Antfragile


“What kills me makes me stronger.”

This is how Nassim Nicholas Taleb, trader turned philosopher and professor of risk engineering, likes to describe his concept of antifragility.  He notes that a system or institution becomes fragile when the harms of risk increase in a non-linear manner.  



They are antifragile when those shocks actually make the system more resilient or resistant to risk.

An organization can become more robust—if not completely antifragile—by becoming more global. A global organization, as opposed to an international organization has a close connection to the place it is working. It builds off the needs of the national or regional community it is serving, rather than simply applying cookie-cutter services to a new geographical location.

But becoming global takes dedication to the place you are serving and a desire to structure the organization to succeed in the international sector and the country where you work.

Representation on the Ground

A company or organization needs to react quickly to changes in the market and the society. Representation on the ground is the best way to do this. A representative office or an individual who can run your local or regional activities will have the information much earlier than those in the head office. If your organization has a more decentralized structure and the representative has been empowered to make decisions, he or she can react more quickly and position your organization to mitigate risks or capitalize on developments.

Make Your Headquarters Everywhere

Having all of your decision-makers in one room is a great thing. They can interact directly and hash out plans and ideas in real time. I can’t argue with this statement at all, but the need to have a centralized headquarters might just be a thing of the past. A globalized organization can have its leaders anywhere in the world and bring them all together in real-time via a broad range of communication technologies through which a globally savvy and diverse team will be completely at ease interacting.

Moreover, the lack of a centralized headquarters and a globally diverse management team might also produce some of those out-of-the-box ideas your company needs to stay ahead of the curve.

A Little Redundancy is Good Thing

Taleb’s biggest criticism of globalization is that the interconnectedness of a globalized system increases fragility by causing a localized shock to ripple across the rest of the system. A global organization can overcome this criticism by admitting that efficiency might not be the solution to every problem. It is often a good idea to have some redundancies. Multiple representatives competing to provide similar services to the organization or in the market and community can help the organization weather localized shocks.

Imagine an earthquake in California that shuts down a factory for a week or a month. The company relying solely on that factory for its product would lose those days and profit. A company with multiple factories in various regions of the world with the same product can make up for the loss by increasing production in other factories.

Groups competing within a company or organization can also increase productivity and help increase the speed of innovation. Although competition can have its downsides, healthy competition can bring people to develop in ways they never thought possible. And this can have infinite benefits for your company or organization.

Many Eggs, Many Baskets

Companies and organizations excel at providing certain things. And it makes sense to expand the reach of these products and services as far as we can. But the markets may be closely interconnected. Mortgage backed securities had consumers worldwide, but once the demand fell, so did the business. Providing products and services on a national or regional level that might not have a worldwide appeal can help diffuse the risks of an interconnected product market.

On the ground representation can help an organization or company find these niche markets and capitalize on them.

Live in the Post-American Era

With the fall of the Soviet Union, everyone wanted what America had. The US shined as the global leader and influencer. We were the symbol of globalization. What we sold and how we did things were to be emulated. But over the past 24 years as other countries have developed and expanded their influence around the globe, people have begun to question the preeminence of the how America conducts business. Recognize this and attempt to adapt to where you are, rather than expecting them to move closer to you and your way of doing things.

Know that Culture Can’t be Reduced to Simple Phrases

When we talk of culture, often we think of an all-encompassing thing, a fishbowl of sorts in which only certain actions or beliefs can survive. There are many business specialists who talk about the individualism of the West and the communitarianism of the East. Representatives on the ground are going to have a keen sense of what culture and society is in the countries and regions where you work. They can challenge any ideas that reduce a culture to a simple phrase and understand that they are much more like a deeply ornate tapestry. Within a country, society or culture, people have competing belief systems, values and institutions. A global structure will help you gain this more textured view of the places and peoples you serve.

Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Where Did the Money Go? Country Risk and Entering Markets Abroad


Country risk only applies to big banks investing vast sums of money in a country, right?

No. It can affect even start-up businesses or non-profit organizations too.

Country risk is “the risk that, due to the country’s political/social situation, level of foreign reserves, international liabilities or government policy, the company will have difficulty obtaining the return on its investment into the country.”

We saw in the previous post that entering a country’s market requires the examination of the political context. The political situation feeds into country risk as well. Armed conflict or large scale protest can affect the availability of hard currency by decreasing the GDP.

In a different situation, a decrease in hard currency could also lead the government to protect its currency. For instance, Azerbaijan, a country that two years ago was awash with U.S. dollars from its flourishing oil industry is now struggling with money leaving the country. In January, the Azerbaijan parliament put a 20% tax on people sending 50,000 dollars or more per year. Aware that such regulations could affect foreign investment Azerbaijan’s Finance Minister was quick to reassure foreign investors that they were exempt from the regulations.

At the same time, to keep the manat from plummeting, the Azerbaijani government has withdrawn licenses from some private currency exchange booths around the country.

Furthermore, in 2015, Azerbaijan hosted the first European Games at a cost of roughly 1.2 billion dollars. Now it is looking to the IMF and Worldbank for 4 billion dollars’ worth of loans to address issues from the downturn in the oil industry.

How does this affect a business investing in Azerbaijan or any emerging market?

The less hard currency available in the country, the less chance the business will be able to receive a return on investment or the non-profit organization will be able to retrieve the money it has brought into the country.

Monitoring Country Risk

The company or organization is well advised to conduct a country risk analysis before going into the country. It’s impossible to predict everything, but that doesn’t mean we shouldn’t get a sense of the probable. Here are some of the tell-tale signs of country risk.

·         Gross Domestic Product—A falling GDP or a GDP that is too closely tied to one commodity or industry means that this country is at high risk if the price of the commodity takes a turn for the worse. This may make it difficult to find hard currency to repatriate.

·         Foreign Debt Level—A country with a high debt to GDP ratio may be too leveraged, and to pay the debt may need to take hard currency out of circulation. Look at what the trends in debt have been in recent years. Have the country’s loans been increasing? Are they relying too heavily on international loans?

·         Foreign Exchange Reserves—A good way to know whether or not hard currency is available in a country is to look at the amount of hard currencies (dollars, Euros, pounds sterling) held by the central bank. It’s also important to know how the national currency is managed. Has it been floated, i.e. does the market determine its exchange rate? Is it pegged to a hard currency or a basket of currencies? Or somewhere in between? In the case that the economy begins to heat up, the pegged currency could result in higher labor rates and thus inflation making the country less competitive in the global market. A decrease in GDP could then follow, meaning less hard currency which would affect the company’s ability to capitalize on investment.



A pegged currency in a downturn could be hard for the country’s government to maintain. It requires a large amount of the country’s reserves to prop up the national currency.



·          Current Account Balance—The current account balance is the ratio of a country’s savings to it expenditures. Often for comparative purposes it is represent as percentage of GDP. Investopedia notes that “A nation’s current account balance is influenced by numerous factors – its trade policies, exchange rate, competitiveness, forex reserves, inflation rate and others.” A negative current account balance can indicate poor overall health of the country’s economy which can be a warning sign for a company or organization beginning to do business in a country.



·         Investment Level—The Azerbaijan Finance Minister’s fear in the earlier example of the restrictions on cash flow in Azerbaijan was right on the money. He knew the parliament’s taxing money leaving the country could stop companies or individuals from investing there. The less investment in the country, particularly one suffering from a significant downturn in its most important industry, could lead to even greater economic woes. For the company or organization doing business in the country, the decline in Foreign Direct Investment would mean less hard currency in the country available for repatriation.



·         Fiscal Balance—An indicator of how well the country’s government can manage its own spending is its fiscal balance, which is the amount of taxes and assets sold, compared to its spending.  This is the indicator that political candidates in the United States are constantly bickering about. For a company or organization looking to invest in a country, fiscal balance is a way to understand whether or the government acts responsibly with its money, but also whether there is a chance in the future that hard currency will be needed for outstanding debts to foreign creditors.



Each of the above, can help your company or organization better understand the economy of the country you are seeking to enter, and it will give you an opportunity to understand the level of risk you are putting your company into with your investment, whether it be the conduct of activities or provision of services or a deeper investment by opening an office or buying into an already existing company. Conducting country risk analysis helps you keep your business safe.